affirmative action ancestor veneration Asatru Asatru Folk Asssembly Christchurch Christianity Crusades declaration 127 diversity folkish gun laws hate groups Heathenry interfaith Knights Templar Metagenetics missionary activity neo-Völkisch New Zealand News Odinism Opinion Paganism Perspectives Pope Urban II Southern Poverty Law Center Stephen McNallen terrorism thoughts and prayers Valhalla Vikings völkisch white nationalism

Column: After Christchurch, Declarations or Deeds?

Column: Oathbound | The Wild Hunt

On March 15, an Australian white nationalist dedicated terrorist assaults throughout Friday prayer at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand. Fifty individuals between the ages of two and 71 have been killed within the assaults, and 50 extra have been injured. The shooter’s rambling 73-page manifesto contained a confused mess of speaking factors from the white nationalist on-line milieu. He was arrested inside minutes of the primary emergency name and prevented from committing a deliberate assault at a 3rd location.

How ought to people and organizations of constructive intent reply to disgusting hate crimes reminiscent of these? Is it sufficient to publish on-line statements denouncing the assaults, or are such declarations merely the equal of “sending ideas and prayers”? Is there a approach to transfer from being reactive to being proactive relating to the truth of white nationalist terrorism right now?

“See you in Valhalla”

In his manifesto, the shooter claims that he contacted the “reborn Knights Templar” and acquired their blessing for his assaults. He references City II, the pope who started the Crusades during which the unique Knights Templar have been infamous individuals. He writes that his relationship to Christianity is “difficult.”

It was one other line within the manifesto, although, that brought about a groundswell of response from Heathen communities: “Goodbye, god bless you all and I’ll see you in Valhalla.” As reported in The Wild Hunt, the ultimate phrases of this sentence are the one point out of Norse mythology or Heathen religions within the shooter’s textual content.

Valhalla by Emil Doepler (1905) [Public domain]

Heathen organizations have been fast to publish statements that brush apart the Christian parts of the manifesto, assert a connection between the shooter and trendy Heathenry, then deny the connection of the shooter to their very own organizations and iterations of Heathenry.

Is that this the correct solution to go about issues? Like parental posts concerning the supposed “Momo scare” resulting in an precise Momo scare, are Heathens making a connection to Heathenry that the shooter himself didn’t?

In an period of multimillion-dollar Thor movies, fashionable viking-themed tv exhibits, the Norse-themed God of Conflict recreation topping gross sales charts, and viking metallic bands headlining worldwide festivals, it’s unusual for American Heathens to say possession of the mythological Valhalla. It’s likewise unusual for Heathens in america to accuse white nationalists with runes on their supplies of “appropriating Heathen symbols”; do trendy American Pagans actually personal an alphabet developed in Europe two thousand years in the past?

Certainly, the arrival in the USA of Else Christensen’s overtly racist Odinism predates the founding of nationwide universalist Heathen organizations by almost twenty years. Except for the weirdness of People claiming possession of medieval Icelandic literature and historic Germanic writing methods, racist Heathenry was up and operating lengthy earlier than inclusive Heathenry. Perhaps the “appropriation” argument isn’t the easiest way to fight white nationalism.

In any case, that is the query at hand: are declarations after hate crimes actually the perfect response to rising white nationalist violence?

“Not affiliate”

Inside hours of the Christchurch assaults, a web-based assertion appeared that condemns the violence. It now lists almost fifty Heathen and Pagan group as signatories. That is good. That is proper. These teams ought to be saluted for making this assertion.

We now have been right here earlier than, although. We now have seen lengthy lists of Heathen organizations denouncing violence, hate, and racism. We’ve got seen strongly worded posts on Fb and hashtags on Twitter. But right here we’re, standing among the many ruins.

In 2016 – many years after the publication of Stephen McNallen’s “Metagenetics,” which outlined the racist foundations of folkish Ásatrú (“an expression of the soul of our race”), and really shortly after an Ásatrú People Meeting (AFA) Fb submit about “lovely white youngsters” – Declaration 127 was posted on-line to denounce the AFA, a corporation McNallen based.

Thus far, almost 2 hundred Ásatrú, Heathen, Pagan, and related different organizations, companies, and web sites have signed on. My web site, The Norse Mythology Weblog, is listed. The important thing assertion of the declaration is that this (italics within the unique): “We won’t promote, affiliate, or do enterprise with the AFA as a corporation as long as they keep these discriminatory insurance policies.” The declaration additionally states, “We hereby declare that we don’t condone hatred or discrimination carried out within the identify of our faith, and can not affiliate with those that do.”

What have the outcomes of Declaration 127 been? Perhaps adoption of the primary line quoted above means there was a discount in Heathen teams “do[ing] enterprise with the AFA as a corporation” at official, public, and publicized ranges of cooperation. However what concerning the second line, and what concerning the particular person degree? Up to now three years, have the members of the signatory organizations lived as much as their public declaration to “not affiliate” with Heathens who “condone hatred or discrimination carried out within the identify of our faith?”

I’ve repeatedly heard members and leaders of signatory teams insist that “folkish doesn’t imply racist,” that they’ve good buddies within the AFA, that inclusive Heathens ought to welcome AFA members to hitch their organizations, that it’s higher to incorporate racist Heathens (as a way to convert them to a much less hateful ideology) than it’s to denounce them as racist (which might break the peace of the group), and that even asking if their group’s members are additionally in hate teams or affiliate with those that are is identical as calling for a “witch hunt.”

If public statements like Declaration 127 and people after the Christchurch shootings don’t truly end in actual change on the bottom, inside our communities, in our particular person lives, and within the relationships we now have (or don’t), what are they actually for?

I fear that they’re extra about disassociating the signees from racism and white nationalism than they’re about truly combating racists and white nationalists. I fear that they’re extra about insisting “I’m not racist!” than they’re about driving racists out of our communities and our lives. I fear that they’re extra about defending the signatories from the results of public affiliation with white nationalism than they’re about really preventing the white nationalists who pledge allegiance to the identical gods.

If the phrase Valhalla had not been included within the Christchurch terrorist’s manifesto, would the various Heathen teams who’ve denounced the assault have stepped ahead and began petitions? Is that this actually about standing towards anti-Muslim rhetoric, Islamophobic violence, and incitement towards immigrants as “invaders?” Or is it actually about convincing the broader public that racism and white nationalism aren’t deeply interwoven into the previous and current of recent Heathenry?

I’ve been considering so much about declarations versus deeds, and about group statements versus concrete steps. As an alternative of reacting after the very fact to the violent results of white nationalism on the worldwide stage, what can we do to really battle its cancerous presence in our personal communities?

Issues we will do

1. If we’re going to make declarations, we should always declare that “folkish does imply racist.” For any who nonetheless consider that folkish Heathenry isn’t inherently grounded in white nationalism, the Southern Poverty Regulation Middle’s dialogue of what they name neo-völkisch ideology is an effective place to start studying concerning the lengthy historical past of the motion.

2. We should always cease utilizing folkish terminology. Utilizing the time period the folks in rituals and publications (“Hail the folks!”), whether or not defining the time period as “our Heathen ancestors” or “the individuals of northern Europe,” forwards the core doctrine of racist Heathenry – the concept DNA and faith are inherently related – as does waxing poetic about “our superb Heathen forebears of the North.” If a given group defines the folks as “practitioners of recent Heathenry” or “members of this specific Heathen group,” there are many different phrases to make use of that didn’t enter Heathenry by way of the folkish promotion of völkisch ideology.

three. We should always rethink our approaches to ancestor veneration. If the outcomes of a mail-away ancestry check persuade somebody that they’ve a deep religious connection to the 5 % of their DNA that’s supposedly Norwegian, that individual is subscribing to the foundational bloodline-religion conceit of “Metagenetics.” For instance, in my group, Thor’s Oak Kindred, we follow a type of the spherical to the ancestors that isn’t based mostly on blood; we outline ancestor to imply anybody who’s not alive and whom we need to thank or salute – no shared DNA wanted.

four. We should always reside as much as the spirit of Declaration 127. We should always take the listing of neo-völkisch hate teams to coronary heart and ban members of those associations from attending our occasions and becoming a member of our organizations. We should always enact zero tolerance insurance policies for racist feedback, anti-immigrant rhetoric, and Islamophobic “jokes.” One strike and out. No extra overlooking this nonsense within the curiosity of peace.

5. We should always embrace affirmative motion to construct variety. Declaring that our organizations are inclusive isn’t the identical as being a part of numerous spiritual communities. Many American Heathens consider in jail ministries that interface with overtly racist incarcerated Heathens, ostensibly within the hope of changing them to a much less racist type of the faith. If Heathens are okay with missionaries looking for to recruit racists or save souls in jail, it’s obscure why they might be against actively looking for out non-white Heathens and bringing them into their working towards teams. This isn’t about recruiting one individual of colour and that includes their photograph on a corporation’s social media accounts. If Heathenry isn’t a faith for white individuals, our spiritual communities ought to naturally mirror the range of the USA. If our organizations and occasions are filled with white individuals solely, we have to ask what we’re doing that has constructed a de facto unique spiritual group.

6. We should always diversify Heathen presence at wider Pagan and interfaith occasions. We should always refuse to be a part of or attend all-white panel discussions on Heathen points. We should always let organizers know that such shows are not acceptable. I encourage any who really feel that that is calling for tokenism to embrace that feeling and comply with it to its logical conclusion. If the thought of together with, for instance, African-American or Latinx Heathens on a panel discussing Heathen points is offensively tokenist, take steps to battle tokenism. Pledge to solely help Heathen workshops, shows, and panels that includes solely non-white practitioners for the subsequent decade. To very loosely paraphrase Ruth Bader Ginsburg, if Heathens weren’t offended by the previous fifty years of solely white Heathen presenters, why would they be shocked by ten years of solely non-white presenters?

7. We should always finish the emphasis on Valhalla and fixation on warriors and weapons. Whether or not valorizing members of recent militaries as “vikings” headed to Valhalla, or celebrating the violent raids of the Viking Age as intrinsically related to Heathenry, we’re partaking in a celebration of violence that does, actually, align us with the white nationalists. I perceive the constructive intent behind post-Christchurch statements that “there isn’t any hate in Valhalla,” however we shouldn’t fake that the lore presents enjoying tiddlywinks as the doorway examination for getting into Odin’s corridor. Valhalla was a spot for violent males who died violent deaths and practiced violence day by day within the afterlife to organize for additional future violence. It’s troublesome to say this isn’t a faith that celebrates violence if we’re, in reality, celebrating violence.

eight. We should always help the reform of gun legal guidelines. Inside every week of the Christchurch terrorist assaults, New Zealand’s prime minister introduced strengthened gun legal guidelines and a ban on “military-style semi-automatic weapons, assault rifles and high-capacity magazines.” The change invalidates present gun licenses, and the nation’s Cupboard has introduced amnesty for many who hand of their weapons as a part of a buyback program. Is the pressure of libertarianism so robust in American Heathenry that we will’t again even probably the most extensively supported widespread sense reforms to be able to lower the quantity of people that die annually by the hands of white nationalist terrorists?

9. We should always cooperate with information media and regulation enforcement businesses investigating white nationalists in our communities. If our aim is to not merely shield our public picture as “not racist,” however is as an alternative to truly fight this pernicious scourge, we must be able to each shine a light-weight on the issue and take steps to repair it. There are available assets on each stopping and reporting hate crimes in our communities.

10. We should always oppose Heathen rants about Abrahamic religions. Perhaps somebody had horrible experiences rising up Christian; perhaps somebody continues to be mad about Charlemagne’s holy struggle towards the pagan Saxons. However attacking any Heathen who holds a special view by calling them a crypto-Christian, denouncing the Abrahamic faiths as “stranger creeds” or “desert religions,” and saying that Muslim refugees “refuse to simply accept our values,” makes fellow-travelers of Heathens and a few of the grossest teams mentioned in Mattias Gardell’s Gods of the Blood: The Pagan Revival and White Separatism. We’ve got to face towards this rhetoric earlier than it results in but extra violence.

I perceive that many may even see these ideas as excessive, empty, or each. These are merely strategies of how we will keep away from being sucked into an countless cycle of violence and denunciation. We will decide one or many of those recommendations and attempt to implement them. We will throw these all out and provide you with utterly alternative ways ahead.

The one needed factor is that we do one thing past denying that we have now any connection to or duty for the violence that’s more and more a part of our on a regular basis lives.

We will act to make an actual distinction – or we will wait for an additional terrorist assault, then ship ideas and prayers.


The views and opinions expressed by our numerous panel of columnists and visitor writers symbolize the various diverging views held inside the international Pagan, Heathen and polytheist communities, however don’t essentially mirror the views of The Wild Hunt Inc. or its administration.

About the author

Admin